Circuit Court Law Order Book, 1853, Spring Term (April, 1853)


Monday April 18th, 1853

At a Circuit Court for the county of Russell held at the courthouse on Monday the 18th day of April 1853

Present Andrew S. Fulton Judge of the 17th Circuit

E. D. Kernan, foreman, James Colly, Joseph Chapman, Vincent Jessee, Richard L. Meade, Jefferson Jesse, Jessee Fuller, George Gose, Thomas Meade, Wm. Stinson senr., Wilson Elliott, Abner Wilson, Elbert S. Fugate, Thomas H. Garrett sr., Josiah Tignor, Martin G. Garrett, Abram Thomas, & James Roman, was sworn a Grand Jury of inquest for the body of the County received their charge, withdrew from the bar to consult upon their presentments and after some time returned into Court and not having finished their business was adjourned untill tomorrow morning at 10 O.c.

Commonwealth
vs. } On an Indictment for an assault
Fielding Combs

Commonwealth
vs. } On an Indictment for an assault
Fielding Combs

Commonwealth
vs. } On an Indictment for an assault
Fielding Combs

The defendant comes into Court in his proper person and with the leave of the Attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth, & with the consent of the Court confesses a judgment in each of these cases for a fine of $1 and the costs, it is therefore considered by the Court that the defendant make his find by the payment of $1 in each of these cases & the cost

The Commonwealth vs. Abram Nicewander, on an Indictment for Retl. ardt. spts
same vs. James F. Litton on same

The Attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth in this Court, with leave of the Court, saith that he will not farther prosecute these cases.

 

 

Monday April 18th 1853 69

The Commonwealth
vs. } On an Indictment for an assault
David Runnion

The defendant in his proper person comes into court, and with the leave of the Attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth and with the consent of the Court, confesses a judgment for a fine of $1 and the cost, It is therefore ordered by the Court that the defendant make his fine by paying one dollar and the cost

The Commonwealth
vs. } On an Indictment for an assault
James Whitt

The defendant in his proper person comes into court, and with the leave of the Attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth and with the consent of the Court, confesses a judgment for a fine of $1 and the cost, It is therefore ordered by the Court that the defendant make his fine by the payment of $1 and the cost

The Commonwealth
vs. } On an Indictment for an assault
John Patton Clark

The defendant in his proper person comes into court, and with the leave of the Attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth and with the consent of the Court, confesses a judgment for a fine of $1 and the cost, It is therefore ordered by the Court that the defendant make his fine by the payment of $1 and the cost

The Commonwealth
vs. } On an Indictment for Retl. ardt. spts.
Lilbourn McFarlane

This day came the Attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth in this Court, as well as the defendant by his attorney who pleaded not guilty to the indictment and put himself upon the Country and the Attorney for the Commonwealth did likewise, thereupon came also a Jury, to wit, Albert G. Clay, Isaac Q. Anderson, Chas. W. Fogleman, Amos Willis, Elses Musick, Macon Hurt, Jefferson Keen, Patton G. Keen, Jonathan Honaker Jr., Charles Hurt, William Price, & Wm. Gilmer Jr., who being elected tried and sworn the truth to speak upon the issue joined, upon their oath do say that the defendant is not guilty as in the indictment against his is alledged as by pleading he hath alledged. Therefore it is considered by the Court that the defendant be acquitted of the indictment against him, and go hence thereof.

The Commonwealth vs. Samuel Hess } On an Indictment for an assault

This day again came the Attorney for the Commonwealth prosecuting in the Court and the defendant by his Attorney and thereupon came also a jury, to wit, Abraham Buckles, John P. Robinson, Alexander Wright, Elkana Dorton, David Runnion, Lewis Arrington, John W. Litton, Caleb Griffith, Richard Steel, David Owens, John Gilmer & Francis A. Browning, who being elected tried and sworn the truth to speak upon the issue joined, upon their oath do say "we the jury find the defendant not guilty, therefore is considered by the Court that the defendant be acquited of the indictment aforesaid and go home thereof.

 

 

70 Monday April 18th 1853

The Commonwealth
vs. } On an Indictment for Dist. Rel. Worship
William Keath

This day came the Attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth in this Court, as well as the defendant by his attorney and thereupon came also a Jury, to wit, Abraham Buckles, John P. Robinson, Alexander Wright, Elkana Dorton, David Runnion, Lewis Arrington, John W. Litton, Caleb Griffith, Richard Steel, David Owens, John Gilmer, & Francis A. Browning,who being elected tried and sworn the truth to speak upon the issue joined, upon their oath do say "we the jury find the defendant William Keath guilty and assess his fine at $25. Therefore it is considered by the Court that the defendant make his fine by the payment of $25., and the cost. And the Court doth further order that the said defendant William Keeth be confined in the public jail of the County for the term or one month.

The Commonwealth
vs. } On an Indictment for Retailing Ardt. Spirits
Abigail Logan

This day came the Attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth in this Court, as well as the defendant by her attorney and thereupon came also a Jury, to wit, Albert G. Clay, Isaac Q. Anderson, James S. Browning, Elexas Musick, Macon Hurt, Jefferson Keen, Jonathan Honaker Jr., Patton G. Keen, Charles Hurt, William Price & William Gilmer Jr, who being elected tried and sworn the truth to speak upon the issue joined, upon their oath do say "we the jury find the defendant not guilty." Therefore it is considered by the Court that the defendant be acquitted of the indictment against him, and go hence thereof.

The Commonwealth
vs. } On an Indictment for failing to keep his precinct of Road in repair
Dale Carter

This day came the Attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth in this Court, as well as the defendant by his attorney, who pleaded not guilty to the indictment and put himself upon the Country, and the Attorney for the Commonwealth did likewise, and thereupon came also a jury, to wit, Abraham Buckles, Elkana Dorton, David Runnion, Lewis Arrington, John W. Litton, Caleb Griffith, Richard Steel, David Owens, John Gilmer, Francis A. Browning, David C. Ferguson, & Calvin M. Griffith, who being elected tried and sworn the truth to speak upon the issue joined, upon their oath do say "we the jury find the defendant not guilty." Therefore it is considered by the Court that the defendant be acquitted of the indictment against him, and go hence thereof.

The Commonwealth vs. Granville Short } On an Indictment for Grand Larceny

The plurias capias awarded at the last term in this case, having been returned "not found. It is ordered that a new capias be awarded against the said defendant returnable here at the next term & the cause is continued.

 

 

Monday April 18th 1853 71

The Commonwealth vs. Ann Whited } On an Indictment for an Assault

For reasons appearing to the Court, It is ordered that this cause be continued till the next term.

The Commonwealth vs. Davis McLaughlin } On an Indictment for an Assault
same vs. Cornelius McLaughlin } On an Indictment for an Assault

The defendants by their Attorneys alledging that Mastin Dillion who entered himself as prosecutor in these cases is insolvent on the motion of the said defendants by their attorneys it is ordered that these cases be dismissed unless security for the payment of such costs as may be awarded to the said defendants and also of the fees which will become due to the officers of this court be given with the clerk before the first day of the next term, and on motion of the attorney for the Commonwealth these causes are continued till the next term for the Commonwealth.


The Commonwealth
vs. } On an Indictment for failing to keep his precinct of Road in repair
Samuel E. Gilmer

This day came the attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth in this court as well as the defendant by his attorney, and thereupon came also a jury, to wit, Eleses Musick, Albert G. Clay, William Price, Charles W. Fogleman, Amos Willis, Jonathan Honaker Jr., Jefferson Skeen, Isaac Q. Anderson, Ira Reynolds, Aaron H. Nash & Martin Frailey, who being elected tried and sworn the truth to speak upon the issue joined upon their oath do say "we the jury find the defendant not guilty. Therefore it is considered by the court that the defendant be acquited of the indictment aforesaid and go hence thereof.

It is ordered that the Court be adjourned till tomorrow at 10 Oc.

And. T. Fulton


Tuesday April 19th 1853

At a Circuit Court for the County of Russell continued by adjournment and held at the Courthouse on Tuesday the 19th day of April 1853

Present the same Judge as on yesterday.

The Grand Jury who were adjourned on yesterday this day appeared in Cort persuant to said adjournment, and returned to their appartment to consult upon their presentments and after some time returned into Court and made the following presentments. An Indictment against Wm. Richardson for an assault - a true bill
An Indictment against Wm. Duncan for an assault - a true bill
An Indictment against John M. Combs for an assault - a true bill
An Indictment against Rees Steel for an assault - a true bill
An Indictment against George Hackney for an assault - a true bill
An Indictment against Michael Lark Jr. for an assault - a true bill
An Indictment against George Hackney for an assault - a true bill
An Indictment against David P. Isley for an assault - a true bill
An Indictment against James Gose for Distb. Religious Worship - a true bill
An Indictment against Andrew Frailey & Wm. C. Jackson for obstructing the public Road - a true bill
An Indictment against Daniel Hagy for Retl. Ardt. Spts. without a license - a true bill

 

 

72 Tuesday April 19th, 1853

And an Indictment against Jessee Keeth for Retl. Ardt. Spts. without a license - a true bill
And having nothing further to present they are discharged.

Ordered that the several persons against whom Indictments have this day been found be summoned to appear here on the first day of the next term, and answer to the same.

A Hupp Pltf.
vs. } On a motion on a Forth Coming Bond
Michael Ascue Ancil Ascue & Saml. Robinson Defts.

It appearing to the Court that the defendants have had legal notice of this motion, they were solemnly called but failed to appear, on motion of the plaintiff it is ordered that judgment be granted and execution be awarded him against the said defendant for the sum of $277.18 but to be discharged by the payment of $138.59 with legal interest thereon from the 3rd day of November 1852 till paid and the cost.

James S. Browning Plaintiff
vs. } On a motion on a forthcoming bond
Michael Ascue & Harvey Gray Defts.

It appearing to the Court that the defendants have had legal notice of this motion, they were solemnly called but failed to appear, on motion of the plaintiff it is ordered that judgment be granted and execution be awarded him against the said defendant for the sum of $483.26 but to be discharged by the payment of $241.63 with legal interest thereon from the 25th day of October 1852 till paid and the cost.

Thos. C. McClearey Plaintiff
vs. } On a motion on a forthcoming bond
Michael Ascue & Harvey Gray Defts.

It appearing to the Court that the defendants have had legal notice of this motion, they were solemnly called but failed to appear, on motion of the plaintiff it is ordered that judgment be granted and execution be awarded him against the said defendant for the sum of $212 but to be discharged by the payment of $106 with legal interest thereon from the 25th day of October 1852 till paid and the cost.

James Dickenson & N. B. Gray Admrs. of James Gray (decd) Plaintiff
vs. } On a motion on a forthcoming bond
Harvey Gray, John Dickenson & Joseph Combs Defts.

It appearing to the Court that the defendants have had legal notice of this motion, they were solemnly called but failed to appear, on motion of the plaintiffs it is ordered that judgment be granted and execution be awarded him against the said defendant for the sum of $4396.90 but to be discharged by the payment of $2198.45 with legal interest thereon from the 25th day of October 1852 till paid and the cost.

The Commonwealth vs. Lewis Low On an Indictment for an assault

The summons award against the said defendant having been returned not found, it is ordered that a new Summons be awarded against the said defendant, directed to the Sherriff of Tazewell County made returnable here on the first day of the next term.

 

 

Tuesday April 19th, 1853 73

A. L. Hendricks Pltf.
vs. } On a motion on a Forth Coming Bond
Danl. J. Ayres, Jno. W. Litton & John F. McElhenney Defts.

It appearing to the Court that the defendants have had legal notice of this motion, they were solemnly called but failed to appear, on motion of the plaintiff it is ordered that judgment be granted and execution be awarded him against the said defendant for the sum of $102.88 but to be discharged by the payment of $51.44 with legal interest thereon from the 8th day of December 1852 till paid and the cost.

The Commonwealth Pltf.
vs. } On an Indictment for an Assault
David McCloud Deft.

The defendant in his proper person comes into Court and with the leave of the Attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth and with the consent of the Court confesses a judgment for a fine of $1. Therefore it is considered by the Court that the defendant make his find by the payment of $1 and the cost.

The Commonwealth Plaintiff.
vs. } On an Indictment for an Assault
James Horton Deft.

This day came as well the attorney for the Commonwealth prosecuting in the Court as the defendant by his attorney, and thereupon came also a jury, to wit, Reubin Finney, Thomas Gibson, Henry G. Mead, Jarett Justice, David C. Ferguson, Calvin T. Fields, Saml. P. Fogleman, Joseph King, Thomas J. Davis, Saml. Hargiss Jr., Alexander Wright, & Charles Johnston, who being duly elected tried and sworn the truth to speak upon their oath do say "We the Jury find the defendant not guilty" therefore it is considered by the Court that the defendant be acquitted of the indictment aforesaid and go hence thereof.

The Commonwealth Plaintiff.
vs. } On an Indictment for an Assault
Harvey Steel Deft.

This day came again the attorney for the Commonwealth prosecuting in this Court, as the defendant by his attorney, and thereupon came also a jury, to wit, John Harris, Saml. B. Heaberlin, Thomas J. Ruley, Joel Fields, Barton Ray, Thomas Fletcher, John Sullivan, John Belcher, Anthony M. Ferguson, Nathan E. Burdine, Hardey Pool, & Elijah Rasnake Jr., who being duly elected tried and sworn the truth to speak upon the issue joined and having fully heard the case they were sent out of Court to consult upon their verdict and after some time returned into court and declaring that they could not agree upon a verdict, John Harris, one of the jurors is withdrawn and the rest from rendering a verdict discharged, and the case is continued until the next term.

The Commonwealth vs. Mastin Dillion } On an Indictment for an Assault
same vs. Thos. J. Riley } On an Indictment for an Assault

On motion of the attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth in this Court it is ordered that these causes be continued until the next term.

 

 

74 Tuesday Apl 19th 1853

The Commonwealth Plaintiff
vs. } On an Indictment for an Assault
Mitchel Fields Deft.

This day came as well the attorney for the Commonwealth prosecuting for the Commonwealth in the Court as the defendant by his Attorney and thereupon came also a jury, to wit, Stephen E. Ratliff, Thomas J. Davis, Jarrett Justice, John Wright Jr., Wm. G. Cowan, Charles Johnston, Joseph King, Saml. Hargis Jr., Saml. Dickenson, Henry G. Mead, Thomas Gibson, & Reubin Finney, who being elected tried and sworn the truth to speak upon the issue joined upon their oath do say "we the jury find the defendant not guilty, therefore it is considered by the Court that the defendant be acquitted of the indictment aforesaid and go home thereof.

The Commonwealth Plaintiff
vs. } On an Indictment for an Assault
Stephen Hold Deft.

It appearing that in this case a summons was issued by the clerk of this court directed to the sherriff of Washington County commanding him to summons the said defendant to appear here on the first day of this term and to have here on that day the said summons and it appearing that the said sherriff has failed to action the same. On motion of the Attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth in the Court, it is ordered that Mathew H. Buchanan Sherriff of the said County of Washington be summoned to appear here and show cause if any he can, why he not be fined for his said contempt, and it is further ordered that a new Summons be awarded against the said defendant Hold, directed to the Sheriff of Washington County returnable here on the first day of the next term, to which time this cause is continued.

The Commonwealth Plaintiff
vs. } On An Indictment for failing to keep his precinct of road in repair
Anthony M. Ferguson Defendant

This day came as well the attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth in this Court as the defendant by his Attorney who pleaded not guilty to the indictment and put himself upon the Country, and the Attorney for the Commonwealth did likewise, and thereupon came also a jury, to wit, Stephen E. Ratliff, Thomas J. Davis, Jarrett Justice, John Wright Jr., Wm. G. Cowan, Charles Johnston, Joseph King, Samuel Hargis Jr., Henry G. Mead, Thomas Gibson & Reubin Finney, who being elected tried and sworn the truth to speak upon the issue joined upon their oath do say "we the Jury find the defendant not guilty, therefore it is considered by the Court that the defendant be acquitted of the indictment aforesaid and go hence thereof.

The Commonwealth vs. Fielding Combs & Mary Hackney, On An Indictment for Lewdness
same vs. Elbert Redwine - On An Indictment for an Assault
same vs. Isaac Frailey - On An Indictment for an Assault
same vs. Lorenzo D. Carroll - On An Indictment for an Assault
same vs. James Honaker - On An Indictment for an Assault
same vs. Josiah Tignor - On An Indictment for an Assault
same vs. Elbert Redwine - On An Indictment for Retl. Ardt. Spts. without a license
same vs. Albert G. Clay - on an Indictment for same

 


Tuesday April 19th 1853 75


This day came the defendants by their attorneys who pleaded not guilty to the indictments and put themselves upon the Country and the attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth in this court did likewise and the causes are continued until the next term

Jacob Owens for Saml. B. Heaberlin plaintiff
vs } in debt
John W Hendricks and Anderson Hendricks defendants

This day came the parties by their attorneys and they're also a jury, to wit, Thomas Addison, Joseph King, Thomas J. Davis, Stephen E. Ratliff, Samuel Hargis Jr., Charles Johnston, William Artrip, Ezekiel K. Counts, John Wright, Joel Fields, & Lewis Arrington & Wm. G. Cowan, who being elected tried and sworn the truth to speak upon the issue join upon their oath do say "we the jury find for the plaintiff the debt in the declaration mentioned to be discharged by the payment of $70 with interest thereon from the 6th day of December 1848 till paid. Therefore it is considered by the court that the plaintiff recover against the said defendants the sum of seventy dollars with legal interest thereon from the 6th day of December 1848 till paid and his costs and this behalf expended.

Ordered that Shadrick W. White and Peter W. Kelly be summoned to appear here on the first day of the next term and show cause if anything they can why they shall not be fined for failing to attend and serve as jurors on this day after having been duly summoned by the sheriff.

Wm. Keith was committed to the jail of this County on yesterday by an order of this court was this day again brought into court and required to give security for his good behavior of the ensuing 12 months where the said William Keith and Steven Benner and Martin Frailey his securities here in court acknowledged themselves indebted to the Commonwealth of Virginia and the sum of $200 to wit the said William Keith in the sum of $100 and the said Stephen Banner and Martin Frailey in the sum of $50 each of their respective lands and tenements good and chattels to be levied and to the said Commonwealth for the use of thereof to be rendered. Yet upon this condition that if the said William Keith shall keep the peace and be of good behaviour towards all of the citizens of this Commonwealth for the ensuing 12 months then this recognizance to be void and then the said Keith was discharged from his imprisonment.

The Commonwealth vs Chas. Short & Sally Mullins - On An Indictment for Lewdness
same vs. Harvey Dye - On an Indictment for an assault

The summons heretofore awarded against the said defendants having been returned not found. On Motion of the Attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth if this Court, a capias is awarded against the said defendants returnable here on the first day of the next Term.

The Commonwealth vs. Lorenzo D. Vincell - On an Indictment for an assault

The summons heretofore awarded against the said defendant having been returned not found. On Motion of the Attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth if this Court, a capias is awarded against the said defendants returnable here on the first day of the next Term.

The Commonwealth vs. Clabourn Hicks - On an Indictment for an assault

The summons heretofore awarded against the said defendant having been returned not found. On Motion of the Attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth if this Court, a capias is awarded against the said defendants returnable here on the first day of the next Term.

 

 

76 Tuesday April 19th 1853

The Commonwealth vs. Lucy Fraily - On An Indictment for Ret. Ardt. Spts.
same vs. James Skeen - On An Indictment for Ret. Ardt. Spts

The Attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth in the Court with leave of the Court saith that he will not further prosecute in these cases.

The Commonwealth Pltf.
vs. } On An Indictment for failing to keep his precinct of Road in repair
John Gilmer

The defendant by his Attorney demurred generally to the indictment and pleaded not guilty and put himself upon the Country, and the Attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth did likewise & the case is continued till the next term.

The Commonwealth vs. Catharine Perkins, Rule

For reasons appearing to the Court this cause is continued until the next Term.

Joseph Hackney pltf. vs. Chas. D. Boyd Deft. - Trover

For reasons appearing to the Court this cause is continued until the next Term at the cost of the plaintiff.

Ordered that the Court be adjourned till tomorrow morning at 9 Oc.

And. T. Fulton

 

Wednesday April 20th 1853

At a circuit court court for the County of Russell continued by adjournment and held at the Courthouse on Wednesday the 20th day of April 1853.

Present the same Judge as on yesterday.

James Skeen Pltf.
vs. } In Case
Aaron H. Nash Deft.

This day came the parties by their Attorneys and the deft. by his Attorney filed two pleas in writing and the plaintiff by his attorney moved the Court to set aside the second plea upon the grounds that the matter thereof could not properly be pleaded in this action, and the Court being of that opinion accordingly set aside the said second plea and admitted the first to be filed to which the plaintiff replied generally & issue, and thereupon came a jury, to wit, Morgan Gilmer, Samuel P. Fogleman, Patton G. Keen, Elijah S. Counts, Wm. P. Horton, Thomas Davis, Robert Boyd, Geo. W. Robinson, Wm. Pucket, Emanuel Tignor, Thomas P.Addison & Thomas Fletcher, who being elected tried and sworn the truth to speak upon the issue joined upon their oath do say "we the jury find for the plaintiff and assess his damages at $16.75. Therefore it is considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover against the defendant the sum of $16.75 his damage as aforesaid, in the form aforesaid assessed by the jurors aforesaid and his costs in this behalf expended.

The defendant by his attorney moved the court to set aside said verdict and grant him a new trial, which motion was ordered by the Court.

 

 

Wednesday April 20th 1853 77


James C. Shoemaker & wife Plaintiff
vs. } In Case
Wm. Kelly & wife

This day came the parties by their attorneys and thereupon came also a jury, to wit, John Amburgy, Isaac McFadden, Nathan E. Burdine, Isaiah Cumbo, Noah Fuller, Vincent Browning, Thomas W. Davis, Charles Johnston, Stephen G. Samples & John C. Weddle, who being elected tried and sworn the truth to speak upon the issue joined, upon their oath do say "we the jury find for the defendant. Therefore it is considered by the Court that the plaintiffs take nothing by his bill & that the said defendant recover against the said plaintiffs their costs in this behalf expended.

William Kelly & others for Alexander Findley Plaintiffs
vs. } Ejectment
Elijah Holton Defendant

On motion of the plaintiff by their attorney leave is granted them to amend their declaration upon condition of their paying to the defendant the costs occasioned him by such amendment & the cause is remanded to the rules for further proceedings to be had therein.

Abner Crump for Geo. W. Hopkins Plaintiff
vs. } In Case
A. F. Hendricks

Geo. W. Hopkins Plaintiff
vs. } In Case
A. F. Hendricks

An Order having been made by this court on the 29th day of September 1852 in these causes submitting all matters of difference between them to the final determination of Beverly R. Johnston, Arthur C. Cummings and Samuel Leece and the said Johnston having refused to act as arbitrator it is therefore ordered that Chas. J. Cummings be substituted in the [...] of the said Johnston and these causes are continued till the next Term.

A rule having been made on yesterday against Peter W. Kelly requiring him to appear here on the first day of the next term and show cause, if any he can, why he should not be fined for failing to attend as a juror appeared in court on this day and showing a reasonable excuse for such failure the said rule on his motion is now discharged.

Patton G. Keen against whom a rule was made at the last term for failing to attend as a witness in behalf of Meshack White against Robert Horton, showing a reasonable excuse for such failure, the said rule on his motion is now discharged.

Joseph Hackney Plft. vs. Chas. D. Boyd Deft. In trover.

For reasons appearing to the Court it is ordered that this cause be continued until the next term at the cost of the plaintiff.

Simeon Hunt & others Plfts vs. James Samples & others, Issue out of Chancery.

For reasons appearing to the Court it is ordered that this cause be continued until the next term at the cost of the plaintiffs .

 

 

78 Wednesday April 20th 1853

Henry Skeen Plaintiff vs. Caleb Hawkins & wife Defendants, In Case
George Philips by gl Plfts. vs. H. M. Carter & Price Sullivan Defts. In Trespass

By agreement of the parties, it is ordered that these causes be dismissed each party paying their own cost.

Frederick Deal Plft. vs. David Tiller Deft. } In case
James M. Crawford Plft vs. James Jessee Deft. } In debt

For reasons appearing to the Court, it is ordered that these causes be continued until the next term.

The Commonwealth Plft. vs. James Robnett Deft. On Motion on a forthcoming bond
same Plft. vs. same Deft, On Motion on a forthcoming bond

For reasons appearing to the Court, it is ordered that these causes be continued until the next term.

Andy F. Hendricks Plft
vs. } On a Motion on a forthcoming bond
Richard Ferrell & Larkin Ferrell Defts

It appearing to the Court that the defendants have had legal notice of this motion they were solemnly called but failed to appear, on motion of the plaintiff it is ordered that judgment be granted and execution awarded him against the said defendants for the sum of $63.64 but to be discharged by the payment of $31.82 with legal interest thereon from the 7th day of December 1852 till paid and the costs.

James Chafin having been guilty of a contempt of Court by coming into the Courthouse intoxicated whilst the court was in session and making a loud noise so as to disturb the proceedings of Court was sentenced to confinement in the jail of this county until six o'clock of this day.

Ezekiel Counts Plft.
vs. } In case
Wm. Smith Deft.

This day came the parties by their attorneys and thereupon came also a jury, to wit, Zadok N. Gardner, Nelson Gray, Isaac M. Fadden, Thomas T. Hawkins, Isaiah Cumbo, Noah Fuller, David H. Jessee, Vincent Browning, Thomas W. Davis, Charles Johnston, Stephen G. Samples, John C. Weddle, who being elected tried and sworn the truth to speak upon the issue joined & not having fully heard the evidence, they are adjourned until tomorrow morning at 9 O.c.

The Commonwealth plft. vs. Davis McLaughlin Deft, On An Indictment for assault
same Plft. vs. Cornelius McLaughlin Deft, On An Indictment for assault

The order entered in these causes on the 2nd day of the present term are set aside, and on motion of the defendant by their counsel and for reasons appearing to the Court it is ordered that Mastin Dillion who is prosecutor in these cases be summoned to appear hear on the first day of the next term and show cause if any he can why he should not give security for the costs of these prosecutions.

Ordered that the Court be now adjourned untill tomorrow morning at 9 O.c

And. T. Fulton

 

 

Thursday April 21st, 1853 79

At a Circuit Court for the County of Russell continued by adjournment and held at the Courthouse on Thursday the 21st day of April 1853

Present the same Judge as on yesterday

The Commonwealth Plft.
vs. } On an Indictment for an assault
James C. Gibson Deft.

This day came as well the Attorney for the Commonwealth as well as the defendant by his attorney & on motion of the defendant he lath leave to withdraw his plea heretofore pleaded which is done, and thereupon the defendant demurred to the Indictment in which demurrer the Attorney for the Commonwealth joined & the matters of law thereon arising being argued by Counsel doth sustain said demurrer; it is therefore considered that the Commonwealth take nothing by her bill but the defendant be discharged

Ezekiel Counts Plaintiff
vs. } Case
William Smith Defendant

This day came again the parties by their Attorneys and also the Jury sworn yesterday to try the issue in this cause, appeared in Court according to their adjournment and having fully heard the evidence, were sent out of court to consult of their verdict, and after some time returned into Court and upon their oath do say "we the Jury find for the defendant, therefore it is considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his bill, and that the defendant recover against the said Plaintiff his costs in this behalf expended

Leonard Shoemaker Plaintiff
vs. } Case
Russell Musick

For reasons appearing to the court, it is ordered that this cause be continued until the next term

Meshack White plft vs. Robert A. Horton Deft. (Cont)

The parties by their Attorneys mutually submit all matter in difference between them in this suit to the final determination of James P. Carrell & Thos. C. M. Alderson and their award or the award of such person as they shall choose for an umpire thereupon is to be made the judgment of the Court and the same is ordered accordingly, and the cause is continued until the next term.

On motion of John T. Howard he took the oath of Administration and entered into and acknowledged his bond in the sum of Two Thousand and five hundred dollars with Wm. B. Aston & Thomas W. Davis as his securities, conditioned as the Law directs a certificate is therefore granted him for obtaining letters of Administration on the estate of Jane Fletcher decd. in due form.

Ordered that Thos. W. Davis, Thos. J. Richardson, Gabriel Jessee & Elijah Ferrell or any three of them after being first duly sworn for the purpose do view and appraise in current money all the personal property and slaves if any to them produced for Jane Fletcher decd. and return such appraisment under their hands signed by the adminstrators to the Court.

 

 

80 Thursday April 21st, 1853

Isaac Vermillion Plft vs John Benner Deft. Summons

The summons issued by the clerk against the defendant as a debtor of Bromfield McCoy, sent a written acknowledgment to in which he acknowledged himself in debted to the said Bromfield McCoy a sufficient amount for all the claims for which he has been summoned therefore it is considered by the court that the said Isaac Vermillion recover against the said John Banner the sum of $9.00 with which he is charged in the said summons, together with the costs in this behalf expended

Beverly R. Johnston Pltf vs. John Benner Deft Summons

The summons issued by the clerk against the defendant as a debtor of Bromfield McCoy, send a written acknowledgement to court in which he acknowledged himself indebted to the said Bromfield McCoy a sufficient amount to pay all the claims for which he was summoned, therefore it is considered by the court that the said Beverly R. Johnston recover against the said John Banner $100 therefore with legal interest as a thereon from the 5th day of September 1850 till paid and $6.50 the balance thereof with which he is charged in the said summons and costs in this behalf extended pr. September 16th 1851 $2.62

David Benner Plft vs. John Benner Deft. Summons

The summons issued by the clerk against the defendant as a debtor of Bromfield McCoy, sent a written acknowledgment to in which he acknowledged himself in debted to the said Bromfield McCoy a sufficient amount for all the claims for which he has been summoned. therefore it is considered by the court that the said David Benner recover against the said John Banner the sum of $4. 36 with which he is charged in the said summons, together with the costs in this behalf expended

Samuel Salyer Plft. vs. Joel Vickers & others Defts. (Assault & Battery)
Tyree Culbertson Plft. vs. Paul Vickers & others Defts (Trespass

The defendants by their attorney severally pleaded not guilty, and put themselves upon the Country to which the plaintiffs by their Attorneys replied generally, and these causes are continued until the next term.

Nancy V. Burk Plft.
vs. } Case
Valentine Bush & Marion T. Bickley Deft

For reasons appearing to the Court it is ordered that this cause be continued until the next Term.

Mary Eliza Baker Plft. vs. William Saney Deft. ( Case

The defendant by his attorney pleaded not guilty to which the plaintiff by her Attorney replied generally & issue & the judgment obtained in the office i set aside an the cause is continued until the next term.

 

 

Thursday April 21st, 1853 81

Elijah Corder Plft.
vs. } In debt
Harvey Gray & John Dickenson partners in trade under the firm and style of Gray & Dickenson Defts.

Plea waved, Judgment by non sum in formattus for the sum of $583.25 the debt in the declaration mentioned with legal interest thereon from the 20th day of November 1850 till paid and the cost, cr. $293. - Dec. 23d. 1850

John Orsbourne Plft
vs.
Harvey Gray & John Dickenson partners in trade under the firm and style of Gray & Dickenson Defts.

Plea waved, Judgment by non sum in formattus for the sum of $830.75 the debt in the declaration mentioned with legal interest thereon from the 20th day of November 1850 till paid and the cost, cr. $415. - Dec. 23d. 1850

Jacob Rasnake Plft.
vs. } Case
David Cowan Deft.

This day came the defendant by his attorney and pleaded not guilty and also filed a special plea in writing, to which plea the plaintiff replied generally, whereupon the judgment obtained in the Office against the said defendant is set aside and the trial of the issues is continued till the next term. Leave is also given to the defendant to file other pleas at the next term.

Simeon Hunt & other Plfts. vs. James Samples & others Defts.

The order heretofore made in this cause is set aside, and by agreement of the parties. The cause dismissed each party paying their own cost.

Ordered that the following claims be allowed and ordered to be certified to the Auditor of Public Accounts for payment.

Ordered that Peter B. Henritze jailor of this County be allowed $1.30 for an account, & also $15.00 for his public services since the last term.

Ordered that Wm. B. Aston Attorney for the Commonwealth be allowed the sum of $50 for his public services since the last term.

Ordered that Thomas C. M. Alderson Clerk of this Court be allowed $17.50 for his public services being seven months since the last term.

Ordered that Isaac Vermillion Sherriff of this County be allowed $10 for his public services since the last term.

John M. Preston Plft. vs. John Campbell & others Defts. Rights

For reasons appearing to the Court it is ordered that this cause be continued until the next term.

Ordered that the court be now adjourned until the first day of next term.

And. T. Fulton

 

 

82 Thursday April 21st, 1853

Thomas J. Riley Plaintiff
vs. } In debt
John G. Duff Defendant

This day came again the plaintiff by his attorney and the defendant not yet appearing it is considered by the Court that the judgment obtained in the Clerks office be made final and that the plaintiff recover against the Deft. $102.50 the debt in the declaration mentioned with legal interest thereon from the 2nd day of March 1852 till paid, and his cost about his suit in the behalf expended.

Jacob Morton for Wm. Clark Plaintiff
vs. } In debt
Hanson Hobbs Defendant

This day came again the plaintiff by his attorney and the Defendant not yet appearing it is considered by the Court that the judgment obtained in the Clerks office be made final and that the Plaintiff recover against the Deft. $77.87 the debt in the declaration mentioned with legal interest thereon from the 3rd day of July 1852 till paid, and his cost about his suit in the behalf expended.

Mary Fraily Plaintiff
vs. } In debt
Albert G. Clay Defendant

This day came again the plaintiff by her attorney and the defendant not yet appearing it is considered by the Court that the judgment obtained in the Clerks office be made final and that the plaintiff recover against the Deft. $75.00 the debt in the declaration mentioned with legal interest thereon from the 27th day of April 1852 till paid, and her cost about her suit in the behalf expended.

John B. Fickle for Thos. C. M. Alderson & Ed. Kernan merchants and partners in trade under the firm & style of Alderson & Kernan Plaintiff
vs. } In debt
Vincent Jesee Administrator of John T. Cowan Defendant

This day came again the plaintiff by his attorney and the Defendant not yet appearing it is considered by the Court that the judgment obtained in the Clerks office be made final and that the Plaintiff recover against the Deft. $83.00 the debt in the declaration mentioned with legal interest thereon from the 10th day of September 1851 till paid, and his cost about his suit in the behalf expended.

Beverly R. Johnston Plaintiff
vs. } In Debt
Richard Ferrell Defendant

This day came again the plaintiff by his attorney and the Defendant not yet appearing it is considered by the Court that the judgment obtained in the Clerks office be made final and that the Plaintiff recover against the Deft. $25.00 the debt in the declaration mentioned with legal interest thereon from the 9th day of May 1851 till paid, and his cost about his suit in the behalf expended.

 

 

Thursday April 21st, 1853 83

James S. Browning Plaintiff
vs. In Debt
Francis Browning Defendant

This day came again the plaintiff by his attorney and the defendant not yet appearing it is considered by the Court that the judgment obtained in the Clerks office be made final and that the plaintiff recover against the Deft. $315.58 the debt in the declaration mentioned with legal interest thereon from the 15th day of April 1850 till paid, and his cost about his suit in the behalf expended subject however to the following credits Feby 5th 1851 $93.40 March 2d 1852 $65.00 Sept. 7th 1852 $50.00 & also paid to counsel Apl. 22nd 1853 100.00.

James S. Browning Plaintiff
vs. In Debt
Michael Ascue, Jno. W. Litton, Josephus Weddle * Ancil Ascue Defts

This day came again the plaintiff by his attorney and the defendant not yet appearing it is considered by the Court that the judgment obtained in the Clerks office be made final and that the plaintiff recover against the Defendants $92.92 the debt in the declaration mentioned with legal interest thereon from the 1st day of November 1852 till paid, and his cost about his suit in the behalf expended.

Richard Plummer & Charles E. Kemp merchants and partners in trade under the firm & style of R. Plummer & Co. Plfts.
vs. } In Debt
Hanson Hobbs

This day came again the plaintiffs by their attorney and the defendant not yet appearing it is considered by the Court that the judgment obtained in the Clerks office be made final and that the plaintiff recover against the Defendants $230.88 the debt in the declaration mentioned with legal interest thereon from the 5th day of November 1852 till paid, and their cost about their suit in the behalf expended.

John Stanley Plaintiff
vs. In Debt
Stephen H. Senter Defendant

This day came again the plaintiff by his attorney and the defendant not yet appearing it is considered by the Court that the judgment obtained in the Clerks office be made final and that the plaintiff recover against the Deft. $100.00 the debt in the declaration mentioned with legal interest thereon from the 13th day of December 1851 till paid, and his cost about his suit in the behalf expended.

John Stanley Plaintiff
vs. In Debt
Stephen H. Senter Defendant

This day came again the plaintiff by his attorney and the defendant not yet appearing it is considered by the Court that the judgment obtained in the Clerks office be made final and that the plaintiff recover against the Deft. $100.00 the debt in the declaration mentioned with legal interest thereon from the 13th day of June 18521 till paid, and his cost about his suit in the behalf expended.

Teste,

Thos. C. M. Alderson C. C.